Ex-referee in disbelief at Livingston-Rangers call

Keith Hackett can't understand why Cammy Kerr wasn't sent off <i>(Image: Stuart Wallace / Shutterstock)</i>
Keith Hackett can't understand why Cammy Kerr wasn't sent off (Image: Stuart Wallace / Shutterstock)
This article is brought to you by our exclusive subscriber partnership with our sister title USA Today, and has been written by our American colleagues. It does not necessarily reflect the view of The Herald.

A former Premier League referee admits he is struggling to understand why Livingston's Cammy Kerr was not sent off for his challenge on Rangers' Mikey Moore.

With the Ibrox side searching for a late winner in West Lothian, the winger looked set to burst into the box and go one-on-one with Jerome Prior, until the full-back's intervention.

There were claims for a penatly at the time, but footage later appeared to show the trip happened outside the box. However, there has been debate over whether Kerr should have seen red for denying a goalscoring opportunity.



Ex-whistler Keith Hackett says he should have and branded the decision not to a "mystery." The only potential explanation he could come up with was that VAR officials were too concentrated on assessing the penalty claim that they glossed over the potential for a red.

He told Football Insider: "Difficult to understand why a red card wasn't issued here for the denial of an obvious goal-scoring opportunity. The player was just about to get his shot away when he was fouled. The covering defenders would not have been able to put in a challenge in my opinion.

"So why VAR and the referee didn't sort this out is a bit of a mystery. I suggest that they may have been looking more at the position of the foul to determine if it had taken place on the line and a penalty kick should be awarded, rather than looking at the denial of an obvious goal-scoring opportunity, because that's what it was."

Get involved
with the news

Send your news & photos
Loading...