The ambition for any club in any transfer period is to come out of it in a stronger position than you entered it. When it came to the winter window and Rangers, that was a need more than a want. In truth, it was a necessity.
The four players that arrived – Tuur Rommens, Tochi Chukwuani, Andreas Skov Olsen and Ryan Naderi – addressed weaknesses within Danny Rohl’s squad that had been evident since before the clock ticked through the deadline in the summer. Seven have departed so far and an eighth will follow, after the Rangers Review revealed that Rabbi Matondo is poised to leave Ibrox six months before the end of his contract.
The wheeling and dealing was a joint effort from the boardroom to the executive floor and the manager’s office. Now it is down to those in the dressing room to repay the faith and the investment and deliver the Premiership title.
The weeks leading up to the window were filled with conjecture and speculation, of debates about how many players Rangers would sign, or had to sign. In the Ibrox stands and on social media, supporters rhymed off positions and lists of potential targets, at times giving little thought to the financial and football practicalities of their wishes.
The Rangers Review stated early in the month what the priorities were for Rohl, who wished to add four players to cover four areas. Rommens was recruited at left-back, Chukwuani brought into the midfield, Skov Olsen solved an issue on the right and Naderi offers an option at centre-forward.
Read more:
- Jens Hjerto-Dahl state of play as Rangers interest in Tromso midfielder detailed
- Rabbi Matondo edges closer to Ibrox exit as Rangers enter talks over Welsh winger
- What Ryan Naderi said in first Rangers interview after record-breaking Ibrox deal
On the back of a summer where 13 players were signed for a net spend approaching £40million, Rangers were never going to rip it up and start again in January. They didn’t need to, either. Rangers are content with their work, and now the results of their efforts will be seen on the park.
The phrase ‘back your manager’ is not one that is used around the top table at Ibrox. Not because Andrew Cavengh and those alongside him don’t have full faith in Rohl. Far from it, actually. But because it feeds into a suggestion that a head coach is given a budget and allowed to spend it as he sees fit. If it fails, the cycle starts all over again. Rangers have seen that movie.
Rohl has earned the support, both emotional and financial, from those above him and around him. Recruitment is a process at Ibrox, and a collaborative one at that. In the space of a couple of days, more than £7million was spent to recruit Rommens and Chukwuani from Westerlo and Sturm Graz respectively. On the night they were presented to the Ibrox crowd, Skov Olsen signed a loan deal with an option fee that is understood to be around £9million.
The move for the Danish internationalist was the most talked about of the window, and not just at Ibrox. Rohl had identified the need for chances to be created and chances to be converted by a player operating from the right side and there was a wish for an experienced operator, a player that was more about track record than potential.
Skov Olsen ticked all of those boxes. It was acknowledged that he would come with a higher price tag and less future value, but the move was progressed efficiently and effectively once it first became known that he would be available after a difficult time at Wolfsburg.
Like the two that preceded him and the one that followed him, Skov Olsen bought into the environment and the opportunity. In essence, what are Rangers selling a player? There is the attraction of the history of the club and the atmosphere at Ibrox. On the park, it is the chance to compete for titles and trophies and play European football and the continued investment from Cavenagh shows prospective recruits that Rangers are moving in the right direction.
That feeling is reaffirmed when targets spend time in Rohl’s company. The German – an intelligent thinker about the game and the world around him - is a man that players want to play for. Rohl has been honest with potential ins or outs over the course of the window, that transparency appreciated by those on the other side of the conversation.
In terms of Naderi, the relationship with the head coach was clearly a selling point. For the last 72 hours of the window, the narrative around the 22-year-old was on a potential sticking point.
As outlined by the Rangers Review on deadline day, an agreement had been reached with Hansa Rostock for Naderi to move to Ibrox in the summer and a fee of around £3million was set. Given the market for No.9s and the prices that are paid, it was believed that the deal represented good value for all parties.
By the time the move was signed and sealed and Naderi was unveiled, Rangers had committed to paying £5million for the striker. It was done through necessity, but not desperation, as the 3.Liga record was broken.
An attempt to sign Cameron Archer from Southampton had started to progress again and the required paperwork was in the pipeline. When it became clear Archer wouldn’t be sanctioned to complete the move, Rangers approached Hansa for the final time and he was allowed to continue onwards to Glasgow having arrived in the UK earlier on Monday.
A return to the negotiating table was one of the contingency plans that were formulated once uncertainty around Archer materialised. The Saints forward was a short-term fix, a quick hit. Naderi has been recruited for what he can do tomorrow as much as we he can do today.
The price tag around his neck should not weigh too heavily on him, like it did and probably still does in the case of Youssef Chermiti. Internally, Naderi is not being unfairly held up as the saviour of the season and the winner of the league.
Is the former Dynamo Dresden and Borussia Monchengladbach man a £5million striker right here, right now? No. Does he offer optionality and an improvement on Danilo? The feeling at Ibrox is yes.
The Brazilian completed a loan move to NEC Nijmegen on Tuesday afternoon. The Eredivisie side will have the option to make the switch permanent in the summer.
By that stage, the hope is that Naderi will have played his part in a successful title challenge. If he does, the extra paid to Hansa right now will seem inconsequential. At this juncture of a season, if you are looking to recruit game-changers and match winners, you need to be prepared to pay for it and Cavenagh and Paraag Marathe, the vice-chairman, have certainly shown their willingness in that regard once again.
If you break the scenario down, the numbers make sense for Rangers. Take into account, for example, the fees and wages that would have been required to recruit Archer from Southampton and compare it to the package Naderi has agreed. Rangers were aggressive and in the market.
That was the case right from the off. Rommens and Chukwuani arrived in quick succession before Skov Olsen put pen-to-paper. The latter two have made steady starts in Rohl’s side, while the Belgian is still working towards full fitness following an injury issue in his final weeks at Westerlo.
Rommens initially emerged as a target during the summer window. Rangers moved on three left-backs – Jefte, Ridvan Yilmaz and Robbie Fraser – and signed only Jayden Meghoma on loan. Rommens had caught the eye in Belgium by that point, but in a period of such upheaval it was decided that Max Aarons could be the alternative on that side and Rangers elected not to push the button on Rommens. Second time around, they moved and got their man.
Read more:
- Issame Charai gives inside story on Tuur Rommens, Rangers move and what to expect
- Andreas Skov Olsen interview: Long-term vision, why Rangers and Laudrup conversations
- Special report: Inside Rangers' CEO hunt, Cavenagh and Gillespie, sporting director
The recruitment team were aware of Chukwuani’s promise even before he played in the victory over Russell Martin’s side in the Europa League. His progress was subsequently tracked and he was the option that Rangers decided to pursue over their interest in Jens Hjerto-Dahl, who remains on the wanted list, and Silas Andersen.
If a fifth deal had been completed in this window, it would have been for another defensive midfielder and five potential additions were considered. Ultimately, it was decided that another player and another personality were not required, with Rangers cognisant of the chemistry that has evolved since Rohl’s appointment in October and the importance of that feelgood factor during the remaining weeks of the season.
Rohl wished to operate with a squad that was smaller in number but not stature. A handful of players – some more obvious and more debatable than others - were deemed dispensable and work was commenced to move them on.
Two names that were not on that list also attracted interest. The Rangers Review reported that Monaco had been rebuffed in their attempts to sign Djeidi Gassama on loan, with an option fee of around £10million. Youssef Chermiti, meanwhile, attracted interest from Fenerbahce and would have banked Rangers a quickfire profit on the fee paid to Everton in the summer.
🎯 Djeidi Gassama once again. His third goal in three consecutive European games.pic.twitter.com/IjjMEkaOuT
— Rangers Football Club (@RangersFC) August 5, 2025
One source has told the Rangers Review that the club did not even consider selling either player and that there was no encouragement given for firm offers to be tabled from any suitor.
There was also no sense of Gassama or Chermiti, or anyone else deemed too valuable to let go, manoeuvring themselves to try and force a move. That speaks to the camaraderie that Rohl has forged within this squad and the opportunity that Rangers believe they have this term.
The Rangers Review reported in December that it was unlikely that any player who was contributing would be allowed to leave, regardless of their status as signed or on loan. The ‘January Tax’ that clubs pay when the stakes are high and the timescales are tight offsets the financial benefits that can be found by selling assets. Money in the bank is useless if the sporting deficit caused as a result is too great and Cavenagh was never going to sanction deals that saw Rangers take a step backwards on the pitch just for a quickfire boost to the bottom line.
The moves for the likes of Clinton Nsiala, Kieran Dowell and Joe Rothwell were not financially driven but there is clearly a benefit of dispensing of those who are picking up wages and not contributing to Rohl’s squad. Those deals are not the headline-grabbing ones that fans love to read about, but they are important in their own right and Rangers have done sound business in that sense.
The window overall represented another period of significant change, albeit not as drastic as the summer period that was overseen by Patrick Stewart and Kevin Thelwell to build a squad in Martin’s name and image. There is a recognition that too much was done too soon at that stage and Rangers have avoided repeating that mistake second time around.
Supporters will always want more players in and more money spent, but those who signed the cheques and shook the hands are content with where Rangers are and what has been done.
Fraser Thornton oversaw the window from an executive perspective following Stewart’s sacking in November, while Stig Inge Bjørneby joined as a consultant in the aftermath of Thelwell’s exit. Rohl and Cavenagh and Marathe, both more embedded and involved of late, were naturally leading voices but others had significant says as Dan Purdy, the technical director, and Gretar Steinsson, who holds the same title with 49ers Enterprises, contributed to the execution of the plan.
As revealed by the Rangers Review , Jim Gillespie will take up his position as chief executive officer in the coming weeks. Interviews for the sporting director position have been paused as the hierarchy consider the structure they wish to implement and more attention can be put on areas such as the academy now that the transfer window has come and gone.
In Rangers terms, there is relative breathing space. That comes with the proviso, of course, that the Premiership title is there to be won. Regardless of how that bid ends, Rangers will go again in the market come the summer. That blueprint is already on the drawing board at Ibrox.
Share